Last Sunday I shared a great video of one person's sense of God's mission for her. We experienced some technology challenges in our 9 AM service, so if you missed it, or if you just want to see it again, here it is:
Random thoughts, musings, parts of sermons/messages that didn't make the cut, and just whatever Jason Matters of Ridgefield Church of the Nazarene in Ridgefield, Washington, feels like writing about.
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
What is Your Life Mission - One Person's story
During the month of September, we are asking ourselves the important question of, "What is My Life Mission?" This question has generated a lot of interest and hopefully a lot of God-seeking prayer!
Last Sunday I shared a great video of one person's sense of God's mission for her. We experienced some technology challenges in our 9 AM service, so if you missed it, or if you just want to see it again, here it is:
Last Sunday I shared a great video of one person's sense of God's mission for her. We experienced some technology challenges in our 9 AM service, so if you missed it, or if you just want to see it again, here it is:
Friday, July 18, 2014
Thank You For the Break From Preaching
To My Friends at New Vision Church:
You might be wondering why I thought I needed to take six weeks off from preaching during June and July. (After all, a pastor only works like one day per week, right?) First, we have so many good preachers in our congregation (as you have discovered), and I have wanted to give them opportunities to preach, and this series seemed like a good way to do it. I hope you have enjoyed hearing so many voices and perspectives.
During these weeks, I have not just been sitting by, doing nothing. The break from weekly preaching allowed me to give extra attention to a few activities:
Finally, thank you for the short break from preaching every Sunday. While I love to preach God's Word, sometimes my creative juices just don't want to flow. I tell my friends that in ministry there are no late papers - Sunday morning comes around every week at the same time. These few weeks without preaching responsibilities have allowed me to rejuvinate a sense of creativity! I am looking forward to preaching in July!
Again, thank you! Nu-Vees are the best!
You might be wondering why I thought I needed to take six weeks off from preaching during June and July. (After all, a pastor only works like one day per week, right?) First, we have so many good preachers in our congregation (as you have discovered), and I have wanted to give them opportunities to preach, and this series seemed like a good way to do it. I hope you have enjoyed hearing so many voices and perspectives.
During these weeks, I have not just been sitting by, doing nothing. The break from weekly preaching allowed me to give extra attention to a few activities:
- I completed a training course on church planting, including certification as a trainer for the course. I started the course a couple of years ago but was not able to finish it due to ministry responsibilities here at New Vision. (See below for the rest of this story)
- I organized and led the men's spiritual deepening camp out. This is a favorite annual tradition for me, and I was privileged to lead it again!
- In early June, I participated in three days of intensive adult curriculum planning for Nazarene Publishing House. I had the opportunity to sit around a table with world-class Bible scholars, talking about how to plan lessons for Sunday School teachers to lead studies of the books of Jeremiah, Ephesians and Philippians. I so much enjoyed the intellectual stimulation of discussing the Bible with scholars and preachers!
- I also wrote an essay that will hopefully be included in a book on the theology of holiness. A colleague and friend from college is working on a collection of essays that share how young leaders view holiness, which is the special-emphasis of the Church of the Nazarene. I submitted an essay on the topic of how we need to teach about holiness in terms of both love and behavior. I will let you know if and when it gets published. (No, I won't earn any royalties on it)
- If there is ever a time to get a short break from preaching, it is during the month of June. During our June board meeting, we set the church operating budget for the next fiscal year. This requires a lot of research and planning. I also have to submit our church's annual report of attendance, finances, and other statistics by July 15th. Let's just say that June is a paperwork-heavy month.
- I was able to lead the song-worship for our congregation on two Sundays, and it was a lot of fun! It was good to pick up a guitar again and sing loud!
- In July, during the week before VBS, I was privileged to co-teach the Churches Planting Churches seminar to a group of pastors interested in leading their churches to start new churches. It was so inspiring to hear how God is moving in the hearts of pastors - and to hear their God-given visions!
- Finally, I have also given a lot of time and thought to planning the preaching and LIFE Groups emphases for the next year. I am excited about the upcoming message series. We will look at improving our relationships, deepening our faith, understanding the Bible better, and developing a sense of our life's mission. This fall, I plan to teach an outreach-oriented series on the subject of forgiveness. Our LIFE Groups will look at several different topics that will also generally relate to the Sunday messages. Let me know if you would like a sneak peek and I will show you what I have planned. I would love to hear your feedback.
Finally, thank you for the short break from preaching every Sunday. While I love to preach God's Word, sometimes my creative juices just don't want to flow. I tell my friends that in ministry there are no late papers - Sunday morning comes around every week at the same time. These few weeks without preaching responsibilities have allowed me to rejuvinate a sense of creativity! I am looking forward to preaching in July!
Again, thank you! Nu-Vees are the best!
Saturday, July 5, 2014
What is the Purpose of Freedom?
Yesterday, on the celebration of the birthday of our great nation, I took a few minutes to read the Declaration of Independence. It was a bold declaration of the dissolution of all ties between the American colonies and the British Empire. The underlying theme? Freedom. The Constitution that followed, including the attending Bill of Rights, underscore the theme. We Americans love our freedom. America... "where at least I know I am free..." right?
We thank God for freedom. As we should. We thank veterans for sacrificing to secure and maintain our freedom. As we should. And every year on the fourth day of July, we stop, celebrate, remember, feast, and blow stuff up. As we should.
But what should we do about our freedom on the other 364 days of the year?
Evangelical Christians celebrated with extra-wide smiles this week as the Supreme Court upheld our cherished freedom apply to our religious beliefs to all of life, including our businesses. But how will we use our freedoms?
If we thank God for our political, economic and religious freedoms, maybe we should ask him what he wants us to do with them! Then again, maybe he has already told us. In the short letter to the Galatians, the Apostle Paul argues that the Christian life is one of freedom, not rules. But after Paul made a great case for spiritual freedom, he warned his friends against the human tendency to use freedom for selfish purposes. He writes, "You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the flesh; rather, serve one another humbly in love." (Galatians 5:13 (NIV)) I realize, of course, that he is not speaking of the political freedoms guaranteed by the documents written by Benjamin Franklin and friends. But the warning aptly applies. There is great temptation to abuse any kind of freedom, to use it for our own self-indulgent purposes.
In the light of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Hobby Lobby case, we Christians have a choice. We can use our freedom to keep more for ourselves or to give more to others. We can use our freedom to blast our opinions or to speak speak more often about Jesus. We can use our freedom to serve others or to serve ourselves. We can raise our standard of living, or help others to raise theirs. What if the world around us saw us leveraging our freedom for the benefit of others? What if we could re-shape the American dream from "freedom to get more" to "freedom to give more?"
By the way, this theme is found throughout the Bible. When God blesses, he expects us to share the blessings. Unshared blessings quickly dry up. When the Israelites wondered what happened to the blessings of God, he sent prophets. One prophet observed their self-indulgent lifestyles, evidenced by furniture upgrades, wine, fine cuisine and fancy lotion, and then he prophesied exile - the ultimate loss of freedom. (Check out Amos 6:1-7)
The purpose of freedom is to serve others humbly in love. Having celebrated our freedom, how should we live? Serve. Give. Go. Worship. (By the way, Jesus told us numerous times that this kind of live is also the most enjoyable.)
We thank God for freedom. As we should. We thank veterans for sacrificing to secure and maintain our freedom. As we should. And every year on the fourth day of July, we stop, celebrate, remember, feast, and blow stuff up. As we should.
But what should we do about our freedom on the other 364 days of the year?
Evangelical Christians celebrated with extra-wide smiles this week as the Supreme Court upheld our cherished freedom apply to our religious beliefs to all of life, including our businesses. But how will we use our freedoms?
If we thank God for our political, economic and religious freedoms, maybe we should ask him what he wants us to do with them! Then again, maybe he has already told us. In the short letter to the Galatians, the Apostle Paul argues that the Christian life is one of freedom, not rules. But after Paul made a great case for spiritual freedom, he warned his friends against the human tendency to use freedom for selfish purposes. He writes, "You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the flesh; rather, serve one another humbly in love." (Galatians 5:13 (NIV)) I realize, of course, that he is not speaking of the political freedoms guaranteed by the documents written by Benjamin Franklin and friends. But the warning aptly applies. There is great temptation to abuse any kind of freedom, to use it for our own self-indulgent purposes.
In the light of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Hobby Lobby case, we Christians have a choice. We can use our freedom to keep more for ourselves or to give more to others. We can use our freedom to blast our opinions or to speak speak more often about Jesus. We can use our freedom to serve others or to serve ourselves. We can raise our standard of living, or help others to raise theirs. What if the world around us saw us leveraging our freedom for the benefit of others? What if we could re-shape the American dream from "freedom to get more" to "freedom to give more?"
By the way, this theme is found throughout the Bible. When God blesses, he expects us to share the blessings. Unshared blessings quickly dry up. When the Israelites wondered what happened to the blessings of God, he sent prophets. One prophet observed their self-indulgent lifestyles, evidenced by furniture upgrades, wine, fine cuisine and fancy lotion, and then he prophesied exile - the ultimate loss of freedom. (Check out Amos 6:1-7)
The purpose of freedom is to serve others humbly in love. Having celebrated our freedom, how should we live? Serve. Give. Go. Worship. (By the way, Jesus told us numerous times that this kind of live is also the most enjoyable.)
Thursday, July 3, 2014
Leadership, Humility & Brokenness: A Tale of Three Kings
Leadership. We love it and we hate it. The feelings that rise in our souls when we hear the word are usually the responses to our experiences - good or bad. We cringe as we think of bad leaders who manipulated, berated, or abused us. We smile as we remember the leaders who inspired us to be and do more than we ever thought possible. Unfortunately, bad memories linger longer and deeper than the good ones, so for many people, leadership is a necessary evil. We often take the phrase, "absolute power corrupts absolutely" and expand it to just, "power always corrupts." But maybe not.
In "A Tale of Three Kings" pastor and author Gene Edwards shares the story of David, the shepherd-King of Israel, and shows his response to both Saul and to his son Absalom. His theme is clear - David did not grasp for power, he did not fight to get power, nor to retain power. He trusted that God is ultimately in control and gives and takes power away to whom, from whom, and whenever he wants it.
This is my second time to read this good book. I recently lead a men's campout/retreat and this was the required prerequisite reading. Needless to say, this got the guys talking because it touches on so many tender spots in the male psyche: painful memories, desire for revenge/justice, our call to leadership, and our longing for significance.
The books talks a lot about the pain we endure at the hands of others (especially bad/abusive leaders). The author suggests that while pain is not good, it is useful in that God uses our painful situations to break us down in order to be completely dependent on him. He even goes so far as to say, "God did not have-but wanted to have-men and women who would live in pain. God wanted a broken vessel." While I think the second sentence is true - I am not sure that God wants us to live in pain. It does seem like most of us are not broken and humble without some pain.
The books talks a lot about our desire for revenge when we have been wronged, attacked or abused. The example described is Saul's habit of throwing spears at David. The author reminds us that David could have pulled the spear out of the wall and thrown it right back at Saul - revenge - and that he would have been justified at doing so. But- and here is a great insight - by doing so, he would have put himself in the "order" or way-of-doing-things of Saul. This is a great reminder that while we can call it "justice," it is really more like revenge when we are seeking it on our own behalf.
The books also deals with our desire for leadership. We rightly desire to lead and to influence - but the author asks us if our prayers for influence come from truly good motives - and to examine our real motives for power and control.
This book is a great read for anyone who finds themselves in a position of leadership or authority. For the one who has been called or somehow thrust into a position of leadership, this is important to read. For the one who enjoys leading and influencing, this is a good reminder and opportunity to examine one's true motives. For the person who resists the call to leadership, this book presents a positive vision for leadership that is centered on character not charisma.
From a formal theological perspective, there are a couple of things to know going into the book. As I read it, I kept thinking, "this author comes from the Baptist/Reformed tradition, but has strong pietist/revivalist tendencies!" This combination of influences is not common. I saw the Baptist/Reformed theological influence throughout the book as the author suggested that David didn't seek power or resist his son's rebellion because he just believed that God was Sovereignly pulling the strings. The pietist influence came through as he exalted weakness, suffering, praying more and doing less, etc. They Wesleyan/Arminiam reader will merely have to say, "I can't agree with how far he pushes God's sovereignty," but will appreciate the pietist influence! It would be foolish to dismiss the book because of a differing view on the extent of God's sovereignty!
There are points at which the convergence of these 2 influences almost goes too far, but the reader must understand the narrow purpose of this book. (Because of the author's strong statements, it can be easy to misunderstand his purpose). The author is not suggesting that Christians should never resist or fight against evil! He is not suggesting a passive spirituality that is all prayer and no action! A short reading of the life of David easily refutes it. The author is only attempting to speak to our desire for personal power and personal ambition! And when this limited scope is kept in mind, we discover a message that we all need to hear!
The greatest take-away for me was the reminder to guard my heart. I wonder if so many fallen religious leaders just became so busy, stressed, and overloaded with decisions and meetings, that they lost their way. At one point, the author suggested that those who lead by way of "rules" and by reminding everyone around them about their authority, are not really leading. Leading by way of rules and position is the easy way out, the cop-out. But sometimes I just get too weary from meetings, making decisions, answering emails, and returning phone calls, and I default to the easy way out. And I can imagine that years of that results in burnout and failure. I am reminded to guard my heart, and regularly seek God, asking him to reveal to me my true motives, and to correct in me any impure motives.
In "A Tale of Three Kings" pastor and author Gene Edwards shares the story of David, the shepherd-King of Israel, and shows his response to both Saul and to his son Absalom. His theme is clear - David did not grasp for power, he did not fight to get power, nor to retain power. He trusted that God is ultimately in control and gives and takes power away to whom, from whom, and whenever he wants it.
This is my second time to read this good book. I recently lead a men's campout/retreat and this was the required prerequisite reading. Needless to say, this got the guys talking because it touches on so many tender spots in the male psyche: painful memories, desire for revenge/justice, our call to leadership, and our longing for significance.
The books talks a lot about the pain we endure at the hands of others (especially bad/abusive leaders). The author suggests that while pain is not good, it is useful in that God uses our painful situations to break us down in order to be completely dependent on him. He even goes so far as to say, "God did not have-but wanted to have-men and women who would live in pain. God wanted a broken vessel." While I think the second sentence is true - I am not sure that God wants us to live in pain. It does seem like most of us are not broken and humble without some pain.
The books talks a lot about our desire for revenge when we have been wronged, attacked or abused. The example described is Saul's habit of throwing spears at David. The author reminds us that David could have pulled the spear out of the wall and thrown it right back at Saul - revenge - and that he would have been justified at doing so. But- and here is a great insight - by doing so, he would have put himself in the "order" or way-of-doing-things of Saul. This is a great reminder that while we can call it "justice," it is really more like revenge when we are seeking it on our own behalf.
The books also deals with our desire for leadership. We rightly desire to lead and to influence - but the author asks us if our prayers for influence come from truly good motives - and to examine our real motives for power and control.
This book is a great read for anyone who finds themselves in a position of leadership or authority. For the one who has been called or somehow thrust into a position of leadership, this is important to read. For the one who enjoys leading and influencing, this is a good reminder and opportunity to examine one's true motives. For the person who resists the call to leadership, this book presents a positive vision for leadership that is centered on character not charisma.
From a formal theological perspective, there are a couple of things to know going into the book. As I read it, I kept thinking, "this author comes from the Baptist/Reformed tradition, but has strong pietist/revivalist tendencies!" This combination of influences is not common. I saw the Baptist/Reformed theological influence throughout the book as the author suggested that David didn't seek power or resist his son's rebellion because he just believed that God was Sovereignly pulling the strings. The pietist influence came through as he exalted weakness, suffering, praying more and doing less, etc. They Wesleyan/Arminiam reader will merely have to say, "I can't agree with how far he pushes God's sovereignty," but will appreciate the pietist influence! It would be foolish to dismiss the book because of a differing view on the extent of God's sovereignty!
There are points at which the convergence of these 2 influences almost goes too far, but the reader must understand the narrow purpose of this book. (Because of the author's strong statements, it can be easy to misunderstand his purpose). The author is not suggesting that Christians should never resist or fight against evil! He is not suggesting a passive spirituality that is all prayer and no action! A short reading of the life of David easily refutes it. The author is only attempting to speak to our desire for personal power and personal ambition! And when this limited scope is kept in mind, we discover a message that we all need to hear!
The greatest take-away for me was the reminder to guard my heart. I wonder if so many fallen religious leaders just became so busy, stressed, and overloaded with decisions and meetings, that they lost their way. At one point, the author suggested that those who lead by way of "rules" and by reminding everyone around them about their authority, are not really leading. Leading by way of rules and position is the easy way out, the cop-out. But sometimes I just get too weary from meetings, making decisions, answering emails, and returning phone calls, and I default to the easy way out. And I can imagine that years of that results in burnout and failure. I am reminded to guard my heart, and regularly seek God, asking him to reveal to me my true motives, and to correct in me any impure motives.
Friday, June 27, 2014
"Gathered and Scattered" is too Simplistic
"Gathered & Scattered"
Gathered: When the church comes together for worship, teaching, fellowship, sacraments, etc.
Scattered: When the church departs the gathering, proceeding into the world for mission. evangelism, justice etc.
What is the church called to do? The answer is easy: BOTH
This sounds nice. It is nice. It is a simple couplet, easy to remember.
But it is too simplistic.
We often assume that our "scattering" is an individualistic endeavor to merely be Jesus wherever else we do life. Or, in an attempt to combat individualism, we sit around tables with Bibles and beers (or coffee, if we are holiness folk), with other Christians and call in community, but in a spiritually neutral location so we can call it missional. Assuming that our being will rub off on others, we conveniently excuse our lack of doing.
Here is the problem - it only lasts one generation. Where is the multiplication? In order for the cause of Christ and the Kingdom of Christ to last for more than a generation, there must be multiplication of disciples and of the gatherings of the disciples. Yes, this includes the multiplication of organizations and institutions, but only as necessary to support the multiplication of disciples.
What if, instead of merely scattering to our workplaces, neighborhoods, and places of need, we scattered as teams, with the purpose and intent to re-gather in smaller groupings, in these other places of work, neighborhood, or need, not for more fellowship, but to intentionally invite others to gather as inquirers, seekers and disciples?
It is just not as simple as "gather and scatter." There must be more. We must envision and plan with an end in mind that includes multiplication "to the ends of the earth." Then and only then are we faithful to the mission of Jesus.
Gathered: When the church comes together for worship, teaching, fellowship, sacraments, etc.
Scattered: When the church departs the gathering, proceeding into the world for mission. evangelism, justice etc.
What is the church called to do? The answer is easy: BOTH
This sounds nice. It is nice. It is a simple couplet, easy to remember.
But it is too simplistic.
We often assume that our "scattering" is an individualistic endeavor to merely be Jesus wherever else we do life. Or, in an attempt to combat individualism, we sit around tables with Bibles and beers (or coffee, if we are holiness folk), with other Christians and call in community, but in a spiritually neutral location so we can call it missional. Assuming that our being will rub off on others, we conveniently excuse our lack of doing.
Here is the problem - it only lasts one generation. Where is the multiplication? In order for the cause of Christ and the Kingdom of Christ to last for more than a generation, there must be multiplication of disciples and of the gatherings of the disciples. Yes, this includes the multiplication of organizations and institutions, but only as necessary to support the multiplication of disciples.
What if, instead of merely scattering to our workplaces, neighborhoods, and places of need, we scattered as teams, with the purpose and intent to re-gather in smaller groupings, in these other places of work, neighborhood, or need, not for more fellowship, but to intentionally invite others to gather as inquirers, seekers and disciples?
It is just not as simple as "gather and scatter." There must be more. We must envision and plan with an end in mind that includes multiplication "to the ends of the earth." Then and only then are we faithful to the mission of Jesus.
Wednesday, June 25, 2014
"Fasting" by Jentezen Franklin is a great primer on the subject!
As I have previously written, God is leading me on a journey through the spiritual discipline of fasting. As I have experimented with various ways of fasting, times to fast, etc., I have read some of the subject. Recently, I felt it was time to lead our congregation in the practice of fasting as well, teaching our members to fast privately, as well as corporately. I discovered, though, that there are very few effective resources designed to teach fasting to groups. Since we use video-based teaching series in our small groups, I was amazed at the lack of resources on video for any group setting. When I found one decent video-based study, I hoped it would be good! It was.
Jentezen Franklin is a pentecostal preacher in Georgia. He regularly leads his churches in fasts of twenty-one days at the beginning of every year. Through his television ministry, he has encouraged thousands to follow. A few years ago he published a hard-cover book, journal, study guide and DVD for those who follow him at a distance. I purchased a copy of each and was pleasantly surprised.
I have been trained to be wary of pentecostal preachers. I have been warned of their tendency towards emotionalism, to putting too much emphasis on speaking in tongues, and especially their current abuse of God's blessings, especially in the area of desiring prosperity (sometimes more than God himself). Of course, wisdom reminds us that the headlines only tell about the most radical in any group, those who over-emphasize any teaching to the point of abuse. Franklin, however, is a gem in the pentecostal tradition. If you are wondering what fasting is all about, read his book! You can get it here. "Fasting" is a book for those who want to know more about fasting, but are weary of radicalism from either end of the spectrum.
I appreciate that Franklin comes from the old revivalist tradition within pentecostalism. He teaches that fasting is a door to a deeper relationship with God. He emphasizing seeking the Giver of gifts and blessings more than the gifts and blessings themselves. His sections on the sanctification of one's life by way of consecrating everything to Christ would make many Nazarene preachers proud!
While reading a description of the book, you might be thinking that at 237 pages it will be a little too technical. It is not. It is a small book, comprised of 17 short chapters. Check it out! You will learn a few things about fasting and you will be encouraged to try it out!
Jentezen Franklin is a pentecostal preacher in Georgia. He regularly leads his churches in fasts of twenty-one days at the beginning of every year. Through his television ministry, he has encouraged thousands to follow. A few years ago he published a hard-cover book, journal, study guide and DVD for those who follow him at a distance. I purchased a copy of each and was pleasantly surprised.
I have been trained to be wary of pentecostal preachers. I have been warned of their tendency towards emotionalism, to putting too much emphasis on speaking in tongues, and especially their current abuse of God's blessings, especially in the area of desiring prosperity (sometimes more than God himself). Of course, wisdom reminds us that the headlines only tell about the most radical in any group, those who over-emphasize any teaching to the point of abuse. Franklin, however, is a gem in the pentecostal tradition. If you are wondering what fasting is all about, read his book! You can get it here. "Fasting" is a book for those who want to know more about fasting, but are weary of radicalism from either end of the spectrum.
I appreciate that Franklin comes from the old revivalist tradition within pentecostalism. He teaches that fasting is a door to a deeper relationship with God. He emphasizing seeking the Giver of gifts and blessings more than the gifts and blessings themselves. His sections on the sanctification of one's life by way of consecrating everything to Christ would make many Nazarene preachers proud!
While reading a description of the book, you might be thinking that at 237 pages it will be a little too technical. It is not. It is a small book, comprised of 17 short chapters. Check it out! You will learn a few things about fasting and you will be encouraged to try it out!
Tuesday, June 3, 2014
Dispelling the "We Can't Change Until Everyone is On Board" Myth
I heard it all the time. "We need to make some changes at our church, but we can't do it until everyone is on board..." Really?
I understand the intention of the person saying it. Whether a pastor or a strong lay leader, we don't want to force our ideas on others. We don't want to lead as a dictator. We really don't like, "my-way-or-the-highway," leaders and don't want to be one of them. We have also heard about building consensus. So, we work to build consensus...but then, what?
Here is the problem with waiting until everyone is on board: there is too much power in one person's hands. It allows one person, or a very small handful of people to become passive dictators! Moreover, as I was reminded by a recent article, most people are late adopters, and they won't buy into an idea until it has already succeeded!
So what is a leader to do? Gently push for change, and try new ideas on an experimental basis with those who are willing to try. In other words, form a test group. Here is how pastor and leadership expert Larry Osborne suggests going about it: "I've found that most boards and congregations will let us try something long before they'll sign off as fully supporting something that is brand new or untested...most people are happy to let us try something as long as they don't have to support it or pay for it. Frankly, there are very few true innovations that require broad buy-in to launch. Most can be launched at the fringe of your ministry with minimal support. Simply count the "yes" votes and start with those who like the idea. It it's successful, everyone will jump aboard soon enough. If it's not, you'll be able to bail out or make any necessary midcourse corrections without losing all of your leadership chips." (Outreach Magazine, January/February 2014, page 70)
Do you hear the humility here? After all, my great idea might not be all that great! But testing it with a group of supporters is a great way to try it and make corrections. Maybe that humility will be all the others need to give it a try.
I wish I had listened to this advice nine years ago. I was working with a team to Re-Focus our ministries and we concluded that we needed to completely re-vamp our discipleship program (which included one adult Sunday School class, a weekly prayer meeting, and occasional small groups) into a full-fledged small group program with no prayer meeting or adult Sunday School class. The idea blew up and a bunch of people left the church. Looking back, I would have been wise to launch the group program with just 2 groups of interested people, and allow the other groups to continue to meet.
So how many people do we need on board to make change? Only enough folks to experiment with the change, and then take it from there!
I understand the intention of the person saying it. Whether a pastor or a strong lay leader, we don't want to force our ideas on others. We don't want to lead as a dictator. We really don't like, "my-way-or-the-highway," leaders and don't want to be one of them. We have also heard about building consensus. So, we work to build consensus...but then, what?
Here is the problem with waiting until everyone is on board: there is too much power in one person's hands. It allows one person, or a very small handful of people to become passive dictators! Moreover, as I was reminded by a recent article, most people are late adopters, and they won't buy into an idea until it has already succeeded!
So what is a leader to do? Gently push for change, and try new ideas on an experimental basis with those who are willing to try. In other words, form a test group. Here is how pastor and leadership expert Larry Osborne suggests going about it: "I've found that most boards and congregations will let us try something long before they'll sign off as fully supporting something that is brand new or untested...most people are happy to let us try something as long as they don't have to support it or pay for it. Frankly, there are very few true innovations that require broad buy-in to launch. Most can be launched at the fringe of your ministry with minimal support. Simply count the "yes" votes and start with those who like the idea. It it's successful, everyone will jump aboard soon enough. If it's not, you'll be able to bail out or make any necessary midcourse corrections without losing all of your leadership chips." (Outreach Magazine, January/February 2014, page 70)
Do you hear the humility here? After all, my great idea might not be all that great! But testing it with a group of supporters is a great way to try it and make corrections. Maybe that humility will be all the others need to give it a try.
I wish I had listened to this advice nine years ago. I was working with a team to Re-Focus our ministries and we concluded that we needed to completely re-vamp our discipleship program (which included one adult Sunday School class, a weekly prayer meeting, and occasional small groups) into a full-fledged small group program with no prayer meeting or adult Sunday School class. The idea blew up and a bunch of people left the church. Looking back, I would have been wise to launch the group program with just 2 groups of interested people, and allow the other groups to continue to meet.
So how many people do we need on board to make change? Only enough folks to experiment with the change, and then take it from there!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


